Because components of the Wahls diet may affectinflammation, oxidative stress and mitochondrialdysfunction, it has plausible mechanisms for slow-ing ALS. Although a cross-sectional study suggeststhe intake of certain macro- and micronutrientsenriched in the Wahls diet was associated with bet-ter baseline motor function and lower risk for get-ting ALS, no case reports or clinical trials areshowing the Wahls diet affects disease progressionor survival in PALS. On the contrary, the clinicaltrial in MS patients showing significant weight lossand essential vitamin and mineral deficienciesraises serious concerns; two thirds of PALS alreadyexperience weight loss at the time of diagnosis,and weight loss is a strong predictive factor for fastdisease progression and shorter survival.Therefore, we cannot endorse the Wahls protocolfor slowing ALS progression.
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
PoNS Device
Considering the fact that electrical stimulation was first used as a medical treatment more than 100 years ago (30), and first used as an ALS treatment 30 years ago (31), it is disappointing that we have yet to find a clear way to use this to help PALS. PoNS™ is a newer version of this. There is a vague theoretical mechanism (neuromodulation) by which PoNS™ could potentially modulate neuroplasticity in the brainstem and cortex, but whether it provides any beneficial or deleterious effects on ALS progression is currently unknown. While there are early, promising data showing that the PoNS™ device improving gait in patients with multiple sclerosis, this may not translate to PALS. There are no pre-clinical data or clinical trials of PoNS™ therapy in PALS to determine efficacy. The PoNS™ device appears to be relatively safe but its substantial cost and prescription-only status will limit accessibility for PALS. Given the current lack of ALS-relevant data, we cannot currently support the use of PoNS™ therapy to slow, stop, or reverse ALS progression. We hope that this review of PoNS™ and the broader topic of neurostimulation spurs future research toward helping PALS.
Nuedexta
Nuedexta has plausible mechanisms for improving bulbar function in PALS. Some PALS reported concomitant improvement in bulbar function for at least a short period when taking Nuedexta for PBA. A well-designed phase II trial in PALS demonstrated the efficacy of Nuedexta in patient-reported bulbar function, and the preliminary result of another trial showed improvement in bulbar physiology. However, its long-term effect on bulbar function is unclear, and one open-label study showed a lack of benefit in one year. There is no evidence suggesting Nuedexta slows down progression or prolongs survival. Nuedextacauses mild to moderate side effects, but severe side effects directly caused by Nuedexta have not been reported. It should be avoided in patients with a known history of prolonged QT interval. Given all this, we feel there is sufficient evidence to consider Nuedexta treatment for bulbar dysfunction in ALS patients with and without PBA. Financial burden and periodic assessment of its efficacy should be considered for the latter.
Glucocorticoid Corticosteroids
In conclusion, corticosteroids are a class of medications with wide-ranging clinical uses and wellstudied effects on the immune system. ALS progression is associated with changes in immune system function, with the early disease states associated with anti-inflammatory immune markers and the advanced disease states associated with
pro-inflammatory immune markers. Although treatment with corticosteroids may cause a transient change in some immune markers, both preclinical and clinical trials have failed to show any clinical benefit in ALS. Multiple individual PALS
have self-reported improvement in weakness with corticosteroid treatment, but these cases have unclear generalizability and are limited by an uncertain ALS diagnosis, limited clinical data during the disease course, and heterogeneity of glucocorticoid type and dose. Although affordable and widely available, corticosteroids can have numerous side effects, and their risks are greater for higher doses or prolonged treatment. Therefore, we cannot recommend corticosteroids at this time as a way to slow ALS progression. Further research into immune system modulation in ALS is ongoing at many research centers internationally.
Butyrates
Butyrates have plausible mechanisms for slowing ALS progression and positive pre-clinical studies. One trial suggests that sodium phenylbutyrate (NaPB) in combination with Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) can slow ALS progression and prolong survival, but the specific contribution of NaPB toward this effect is unclear. Butyrates appear reasonably safe for use in humans. Based on the above information, we support a trial of a butyrate in PALS, but we cannot yet recommend one as a treatment.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21678421.2022.2045323
RT001
RT001 has a novel mechanism for reducing oxidative stress that could theoretically work better than more traditional antioxidants. In the small trial of patients with Friedreich’s ataxia, it seems to be safe and well-tolerated at lower dosages but can cause nausea and diarrhea at higher doses. At the time of this writing, there is very little efficacy or safety data in PALS. An expanded access program is underway which allows PALS at certain clinics to try this compound free of charge. Data resulting from this expanded access program will help the planning of a possible future clinical trial.
Click here to download the complete review.
Antiretrovirals
Antiretrovirals are a group of diverse drugs developed for HIV infections that vary widely in theoretical efficacy against HERVs, side effect profiles, and cost. HERV expression is apparently increased in some PALS; however, it is unknown if this is a
beneficial, neutral, or pathological process. Furthermore, it is not clear if ARV-targeted mechanisms such as cell infection and viral replication are taking place in PALS. Based on the lack of evidence for use of ARVs in PALS who test negative for HIV and HTLV, we cannot recommend them as a treatment for ALS. We look forward to the results of the two ongoing trials of ARVs in PALS.
Click here to download the complete review.
Basis
Basis has mechanisms of action that could theoretically be useful in treating ALS. It appeared reasonably safe in a small, short duration study of healthy volunteers and it is fairly inexpensive. However, we found no data in preclinical ALS models, no case reports, and no trials in PALS. Based on this lack of data, ALSUntangled cannot currently recommend use of Basis to slow, stop, or reverse the progression of ALS.
Click here to download the complete review.