Completed Reviews
Completed Reviews
Here you will find our published reports on AOTs, along with the grades we gave each of them in different categories, short summaries, and podcasts. When new information about an AOT comes out after our published review, we update the summary and assigned grades accordingly, these are marked with an update badge.
How to use this page: Use the search box on the left to find a specific treatment by name. You can also filter the list to show only treatments that have been updated, or only those that include a podcast interview. Click on any treatment name to open its full summary, evidence grades, and podcast on the right side of the screen.
Mechanistic plausibility
Mechanistic plausibility
Mechanistic plausibility - C
Mechanistic plausibility
Mechanistic plausibility
Mechanistic plausibility
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Grade A: Two or more peer-reviewed publications reporting benefits in well-designed studies.
Animal studies are assumed to be ‘well designed’ when they follow published guidelines. When they deviate from these they are considered ‘flawed’.
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Grade B: One peer-reviewed publication reporting benefits in a well-designed study.
Animal studies are assumed to be ‘well designed’ when they follow published guidelines. When they deviate from these they are considered ‘flawed’.
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Grade C: One or more peer-reviewed publication(s) reporting benefits in flawed studies.
Animal studies are assumed to be ‘well designed’ when they follow published guidelines. When they deviate from these they are considered ‘flawed’.
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Pre-clinical models (animal or cell models recognized by ALSUntangled reviewers to be relevant to ALS)
Patient case reports
Patient case reports
Patient case reports
Patient case reports
Patient case reports
Patient case reports
Patient trials
Patient trials
Patient trials
Grade D: One or more peer-reviewed publications reporting benefits in a flawed trial.
Flawed trials means those in which there are identifiable problems with patient selection, randomization, blinding, controls or follow-up. These have ‘high or unclear risk of bias’ according to published criteria. Well-designed trials are those that have ‘low risk of bias’.
Patient trials
Patient trials
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Grade B (oral): More than 0% but less than10% of exposed patients experienced harms (no hospitalizations or deaths)
Grade D (intravenous): More than 0% but less than 5% of exposed patients experienced death or hospitalizations
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Grade D: More than 0% but less than 5% of exposed patients experienced death or hospitalizations
Grade F: At least 5% of exposed patients experienced death or hospitalization
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)
No treatments match your search.
Select a treatment
to view its evidence dossier.