ALS Untangled®

ALSUntangled® reviews alternative and off label treatments (AOTs), with the goal of helping people with ALS make more informed decisions about them.

Risks (harms that occurred on this treatment)

Inosine

by

Inosine is a low-cost supplement that increases the levels of urate, a naturally occurring antioxidant. With appropriate blood and urine monitoring, it appears reasonably safe. Epidemiologic data suggest that high urate levels may be associated with improved survival in ALS, which prompted preclinical studies and clinical trials of inosine. These are still ongoing and will help determine whether inosine could be a useful treatment for ALS.‌

Declaration of interest: ALSUntangled is sponsored by the ALS Association and the Motor Neurone Disease Association.

Click here to download the complete review.

Accilion

by

In our opinion, Accilion does not have a mechanism that is plausible for the treatment of ALS. There is one patient with a confirmed diagnosis of slowly progressive ALS who had modest objective improvements in motor function while using Accilion. However, improvements such as these have been described before, even in patients taking a placebo (32). We believe improvements in PALS are important to study, but they may have multiple explanations and thus are not proof of treatment efficacy (32). At this time we do not recommend the use of Accilion for ALS.‌‌‌‌

Declaration of interest: ALSUntangled is sponsored by the ALS Association and the Motor Neurone Disease Association.

Click here to download the complete review.

Precision Stem Cell

by

At ALSUntangled our goal is to provide guidance on the mechanism, pre-clinical data, anecdotal evidence, trials and risks of various alternative treatment options. Our goal is not to challenge the rights of PALS to pursue these options. Along these lines, MSC transplants in general have a promising mechanism, good pre-clinical data in ALS models and appear reasonably safe when performed with approved standardized protocols, proper oversight, and monitoring. However, the specific protocols used at PSC for PALS are poorly detailed, appear variable in terms of the sources of MSCs being used, the ways these are being modified and the places where these are being inserted, have no provision for confirming the material being inserted, and have only subjective and usually brief improvements associated with them. ALSUntangled strongly supports further study of MSC in PALS, but only with transparent, reproducible protocols that include confirmation of transplanted material and objective outcome measures. At this time, it does not appear to us that PSC is meeting these criteria.

Gluten-Free Diet

by

Theoretically, gluten-induced autoimmunity could trigger ALS. However, the data supporting this link are weak, consisting of two association studies and a single case-report. Further studies are needed to confirm the relationship between GRDs and ALS, and the utility of the GFD in patients with both conditions. In spite of the fact that GFD is reasonably safe, it is a complex undertaking and is more expensive than a standard diet. While we wait for better data, it would be reasonable to screen PALS who have GI symptoms, iron-deficiency anemia, or an abnormal brain MRI for the antibodies associated with GFDs. Those with elevated antibodies could be referred to a gastroenterologist for further work-up, and if this is consistent with a GRD, then GFD could be tried under the guidance and monitoring of a dietician.‌‌‌‌

Click here to download the complete review.

Sodium Chlorite WF10

by

The NP001 formulation of sodium chlorite acts through a plausible mechanism and preliminary data suggest that it is safe and may slow ALS progression in some PALS. The WF10 formulation of SC appears to act through this same mechanism. Although WF10 is available for off-label use, it is very expensive, may have more side-effects than NP001, and at this time has only scant anecdotal evidence for efficacy in PALS. ALSUntangled supports further carefully monitored studies of NP001 and WF10 in PALS. In contrast, oral sodium chlorite has potentially dangerous and toxic side-effects may hasten disease progression, and is not clearly absorbed from the gut. We do not recommend further use of oral sodium chlorite unless it can at least be shown to be safe and to act on mechanisms in humans that are relevant to ALS.